Nahda Publications | Peer reviewed journals

Nahda Publications
Nahda Publications

Nahda NJSSH

Nahda Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities

ISSN

Open Access

This article is licensed under CC BY 4.0

A Scoping Review on Drug Courts as an Alternative Approach to Reducing Recidivism

Abena Pinamang1 and Nunana Klenam Djokoto2

  • 1Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
  • 2Department of Political Science, University of Ghana, Ghana

Received Aug 14, 2026 · Accepted Aug 30, 2026 · Published Sep 4, 2026 · ISSN · Vol. 1.0 · Issue 1 · pp. 1-13

Abstract

Drug courts have emerged as treatment-oriented alternatives to conventional criminal justice processing for individuals with substance use
disorders. By combining judicial supervision with substance use treatment and behavioral health services, these programs seek to address 
factors associated with substance-related offending and recidivism. However, evidence concerning their reported outcomes, implementation, and associated challenges remains dispersed across disciplines. This scoping review mapped the literature on drug courts as an alternative 
approach to reducing recidivism. It examined the characteristics of drug court interventions, reported recidivism and rehabilitation outcomes, implementation strategies and challenges, and gaps in the existing evidence. The review was conducted using a scoping review methodology guided by the JBI approach and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. Literature published in English between 2002 and 2026 was searched across major electronic databases. Eligible evidence addressing adult or juvenile drug courts, treatment courts, or related diversion 
interventions were studied and synthesized thematically. The literature indicates that drug courts are associated with a range of reported 
outcomes involving recidivism, treatment engagement, substance use, and rehabilitation. However, the evidence is not uniformly positive: while several studies report reductions in recidivism and improved treatment outcomes, other studies have found no significant differences between drug court participants and comparison groups, and some research has identified disparities in outcomes across participant subgroups and 
program contexts. Outcomes vary according to program characteristics, treatment quality, participant characteristics, implementation context, and study methodology. The findings highlight the need for consistent evidence-based practices, equitable service delivery, and further 
longitudinal and multisite research to clarify long-term outcomes.

Keywords

Drug Courts, Alternative Sentencing, Recidivism, Substance Use Disorders, Criminal Justice

Affiliations

  1. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
  2. Department of Political Science, University of Ghana, Ghana

Full text & references

Read the complete manuscript

This page presents the title, authors, affiliations, abstract, keywords, NID, and publication history. Open the Nahda-formatted PDF for figures, tables, methods, and the full reference list.

Open full article (PDF)
Cite this article
APA 7th

Pinamang, A., & Djokoto, N. K. (2026). A Scoping Review on Drug Courts as an Alternative Approach to Reducing Recidivism. Nahda Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1.0(1), 1-13. https://nahdapublications.org/nid/nid/njssh.2026.0003

nid/njssh.2026.0003CC BY 4.0 · Open Access